Monday, August 26, 2013


If you liked the run up to the US attack on Iraq, with the lurid fictional tales of mobile chemical weapons labs and Saddam’s nukes, you will love "Iraq, The Sequel", currently unfolding in Syria. It is everything the interventionists have been hoping for: a heady brew of Kosovo, Iraq, and Libya all rolled into one. The possibility for an infinitely more toxic conflagration is exponentially higher.

Pre-Iraq War talking points have been dusted off by the UK and US press and others, as the PR war begins for the hearts and minds of voters. It is alleged that hundreds have been killed by this latest 'gas attack' which is being compared by the UK media to Iraq where thousands of Kurds were gassed by Saddam Hussein in Halabja in 1988.

A number of things don't add up about the recent Syrian chemical weapons attack that will be the Obama's administrations excuse for another war.

Dan Kaszeta, a former officer of the U.S. Army’s Chemical Corps and a leading private consultant, pointed out a number of details absent from the photographic footage so far:
"None of the people treating the casualties or photographing them are wearing any sort of chemical-warfare protective gear," he says, "and despite that, none of them seem to be harmed." This would seem to rule out most types of military-grade chemical weapons, including the vast majority of nerve gases, since these substances would not evaporate immediately, especially if they were used in sufficient quantities to kill hundreds of people, but rather leave a level of contamination on clothes and bodies which would harm anyone coming in unprotected contact with them in the hours after an attack. In addition, he says that "here are none of the other signs you would expect to see in the aftermath of a chemical attack, such as intermediate levels of casualties, severe visual problems, vomiting and loss of bowel control."

Steve Johnson, a leading researcher on the effects of hazardous material exposure at England’s Cranfield University who has worked with Britain’s Ministry of Defense on chemical warfare issues, agrees that "from the details we have seen so far, a large number of casualties over a wide area would mean quite a pervasive dispersal. With that level of chemical agent, you would expect to see a lot of contamination on the casualties coming in, and it would affect those treating them who are not properly protected. We are not seeing that here." Additional questions also remain unanswered, especially regarding the timing of the attack, being that it occurred on the exact same day that a team of UN inspectors was in Damascus to investigate earlier claims of chemical weapons use. It is also unclear what tactical goal the Syrian army would have been trying to achieve, when over the last few weeks it has managed to push back the rebels who were encroaching on central areas of the capital. But if this was not a chemical weapons attack, what then caused the deaths of so many people without any external signs of trauma?
Good question! Could it be that this was a "false flag" mean't to justify the invasion and bombing of Syria? No question that people did die, but how and who ultimately is responsible?

Always look at who gains by this unseemly act. Would Assad, gain? Let's take a close look. Unless Assad is indeed suicidally insane, which he has given no indication of being heretofore, it quite simply makes no sense. Why risk the overt wrath of the entire rest of the world - alienating even your final allies in Iran and Russia - for so measly a gain: killing 300 civilians in a war to the death against US/Saudi/Turk supported jihadists? There is no military justification and no justification at all short of the Assad clan being a Middle Eastern form of the Manson Family. Is that the argument?

In fact Syrian leader Bashar Assad has stressed that the claims of his government using chemical weapons made by Western countries are an insult to common sense" and "nonsense," in an interview to Russia’s Izvestia newspaper.
"The statements made by the politicians in the USA and in other Western countries represent an insult to common sense and neglect of the public opinion of citizens in those countries. It's nonsense: first, they bring charges, and then they collect evidence. And it's one of the most powerful countries that does it - the US. They accused us on Wednesday, and in only two days the American leadership announces they started to collect the evidence. They accuse our army of using chemical weapons in the area that's reportedly controlled by the terrorists. In fact, there is no precise front line between the army and the insurgents in that area. And how can a government use chemical weapons - or any other weapons of mass destruction - in the area where government troops are concentrated? This is against elementary logic."
The main cause of the continuing conflict, the Syrian leader pointed out, is the influx of tens of thousands of foreign insurgents that arrive in Syria every month and kill innocent people. What’s more, the terrorists are provided with money and weapons from abroad. And, according to Assad, world leaders don’t understand the dangers that terrorism may entail - despite past experience.
"Nowadays there are many politicians, although very few leaders, among the heads of states. The point is that they don’t know history and don’t learn its lessons. Some of them forget even the recent past. Have they learnt the lessons of past 50 years? Have they even glanced through the documents of their predecessors who failed in all wars they started since Vietnam? Have they realized those wars brought about nothing but havoc and instability in the Middle East and in other regions? To those politicians I would like to explain that terrorism isn’t a bargaining chip to pull out and use anytime one wants, and then put back. Terrorism, as a scorpion, can bite anytime. You can’t be for the terrorism in Syria and against it in Mali."
Who would gain? Cetainly not what the US media calls the Al Qaeda "freedom fighters", the same Al Qaeda that was blamed for the 9/11 attack in the U.S? Interesting. One day Al Qaeda is the "boogeyman" used to justify war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the next war they are "freedom fighters" who we must support through the CIA with weapons to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya; the "evil" Assad regime of Syria.

Could it be a superpower who needs a pretext for war? Who stands to gain? Here is new bombshell evidence which has just come to light that the the U.S. government has aided the rebels in a chemical weapons attack(Sarin) against the native Syrian population to create a pretext for the invasion of Syria blaming the Syrian government for a chemical weapons attack against its own people.

And here is more evidence that the U.S. government aided Saddam Hussein in his use of chemical weapon attacks against the native population.

Sound eerily familiar? The picture below says it all.

Have you noticed? It doesn't matter that a Democrat, Obama is in the White House. His foreign policy is no different than Bush.

Bush invades Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama destablizes Egypt through the CIA causing the Mubarak government(a U.S. ally) to fall: aids Al Qaeda(our former enemy) in Libya to destroy Gaddafi. Obama's next target is Syria and a chemical weapons attack would be an excellent reason to invade that country. Who benefits from a chemical weapons attack?

Why would a superpower such as the US want to invade Syria? Well, you see the Illuminati plan is to start World War III pitting the Muslims against the Jews and at the same time destroying Christianity. It is to break up the Middle East and reform it into the future global system. You scoff? Their motto is "Ordo Ab Chao", Order Out of Chaos and chaos it will be until that final global Satanic system is fully formed and implemented. You simply must study history to understand current events! Bear with me, I will enlighten you.

Hellish conditions, rioting, killing and desperation all bring opportunity for Illuminati's Great Plan to work out. Invading Syria will do nicely!

What is the "Great Plan"?
In 1871 Giuseppe "Mazzini"(head of the P2 masonic lodge in Italy) "issued a letter in which he outlined the final three part plan of the Illuminati: their grand design for ridding not just Europe, but the entire world of Christianity, and bringing it under the "illuminated" dictatorship of of Luciferianism. He wrote this letter to Albert Pike, who headed up the secretive New and Reformed Palladian Rite of the Masonic Lodge in the United States.

Mazzini proposed a series of world wars. These wars were to embroil every nation in a conflict so bloody and chaotic that eventually every nation would surrender its national sovereignty to an international government, like the League of Nations, or the second attempt -the current United Nations - in order to prevent subsequent global bloodletting. One Masonic scholar wrote in 1987, "The true birth of World Democracy from its prenatal national confinement is even now in progress. A war-torn and bleeding World is in the midst of labor pains, preceding the ordeal of birth. Labor pains in the birth of a New Age." War and confict have been an integral part of human existence since Cain killed Abel. But the Patriarches of Scripture show us an entirely different method than the lofty and grasping goals of a Masonic and Luciferian network to mold the world into their own image, a world where God is no longer the standard of human existence."(1)
Yes, this is what is behind our current events. This is what is driving the U.S. into another destabilizing Middle Eastern War. Lest you scoff at this we must not forget that Obama is a 32nd degree Prince Hall Freemason and that his Masonic ideology trumps his Muslim religion and drives him to follow the Great Plan.
"Knowing that national sovereignty would certainly die hard, three of these wars were proposed my Mazzini to Pike in their original plan. The first of these wars" (World War 1), "they hoped, would topple the Czarist government of Russia and establish an Illuminized dictatorship, a new level in the game of control of populations. This would give the Illuminati a secure base from which to operate, with a large population and vast natural resources to fuel the new engine of the Illuminism. All monarchies had to go, and so they used the French Revolution for their model. The resulting democracies would then be easier to control."

"The second world war" (World War II) "would allow the new Soviet Russia to capture Europe - or as it turned out, half of it. The Yalta Conference can not be understood or put in context until one understands that this was the stated goal. The third world war" (World War III) "would be between the Muslims and the Jews, and would bring about the biblical Armageddon. Certainly by the end of this third world war, the battle wearied nations would be ready to accept any proposal as long as it promised peace, uniting the entire world under the fatal banner of the Luciferian New World Order."

"Albert Pike of Little Rock, Arkansas," a celebrated Civil War hero, who could speak six languages fluently, "had become head of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in 1871. Concerning this final world war" (World War III)"We the Illuminati" (Illumined ones) "shall unleash the Nilhilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of slavery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere the citizens obliged to defend themselves against the world majority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass" (direction) "anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the pure light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view; a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.(2)"

We know that Satan is in control of this world. We know that he is the father of all lies. See the previous article. We know that he wished to compete with God and was thrown from heaven to earth. Here he wishes to set up an earthly kingdom, a Satanic global cashless world system devoid of love and God; worshipping him instead of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

One day all will be forced to bow to him in the form of the Antichrist. "And they worshipped the dragon"(Satan)"which gave power to the beast"(antichrist) "and they worshipped the beast saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him? And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given unto him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb" (Jesus Christ) "from the foundation of the world." Revelation 13:4,6-8 KJV.

I have just given you the Satanic plan of world history as Satan's conspirators go about their work of implementing that plan (world war III) in our lifetime.

End Notes

1. Ted Flynn, Hope of the Wicked, The Master Plan to Rule the World (Sterling, Virginia, MaxKol Communications, 2000), p.71,72.

2. Ibid.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?