Thursday, January 17, 2013

The 1961 State Department Plan to Disarm the American Population to Conquer America From Within. 

State Department Memorandum #7277 written in 1961 by the United States State Department titled "Freedom From War, The United States Program For General And Complete Disarmament In A Peaceful World" describes the plan that was to be followed by the global elites in the future to disarm the American population so that the United States could be ruled by a world international government with an international peace keeping force to enforce any dictates of the world government. That future time has now arrived.

The 1961 State Department memorandum explains how the United Nations will oversee the complete disarmament of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The problem with this thinking is that the U.S. citizens who own firearms are not the ones who continually start wars around the globe. It is the global elites that start all wars.

It describes the plan to disarm independent states (i.e. sovereign nations) so that no serious threat to the world government could topple or undermine its authority.

The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.

The interpretation of the above quote by Richard Gardner is that registration of all firearms and subsequent gun confiscation is part of this plan(as occurred historically in Russia, Nazi Germany) to erode our national sovereignty(abolition of the second amendment to the constitution) and that this is more effective than invasion by a foreign power in building The New World Order.(i.e. world government).

Think about this. Did any country invade Germany to set up the Fascist Nazi government? Did any country invade Russia to set up the communist government ? No. These governments were not installed by invading foreign powers, but rather by internal revolutions financed by capitalists eroding their sovereignty from within the country rather than by a foreign power military invasion.

"The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for "the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." Harpers, July l958.

Yes folks, there is absolutely no doubt that the book of Revelation in the Holy Bible is true in it's description of world history. This state department document and the preceding quotes reveal the Satanic inner drive to achieve absolute power and total world control by the international financial cartel who will one day soon outlaw cash to institute total financial control through a mark and the worship of Satan.

In fact when this total control is achieved you will be required to worship Satan or you will be killed.

"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Violate the 2nd Amendment? Civil War’s A-Brewin’

Matt Barber

January 15, 2013
A pretty, young, auburn-haired woman- mid-20s - drove down a lonely country road somewhere in Oklahoma. Appearing in her rear-view mirror, at the back windshield, were two menacing orbs of light floating amid ashen dusk. The guttural roar of a souped-up big block shook the tiny Volkswagen Rabbit as a van-load of inbred thugs lurched left and drew alongside her. A pony-tailed passenger taunted inaudibly and blew foul kisses between crude hand gestures. He pointed for her to pull over as the van repeatedly swerved dangerously close.

Inside the car a man, asleep in the reclining passenger seat, was startled awake by the commotion. He rose and darted his head about, calmly assessing the situation. This only spurred the evil-bent goons. As they ramped-up efforts to run the car off the road, the man reached in the glove box, withdrew a military-grade, semi-automatic handgun - an "assault weapon," if you will - and, with intentionality and great theatre, leaned across his young bride, pointing the gun out the open bay and directly between dirt bag’s booze-flushed eyes.
Van vanished amid a plume of gray smoke as wheels locked, tires screeched and "assault vehicle" fishtailed - jerking to a halt with taillights aglow skyward from the ditch.

Back at the couple’s rural farmhouse, two boys - boys who would not be orphaned that night - played. We most likely played - my brother Pete and I - with assault rifles fashioned from sticks. I always love to hear Dad retell the story. He does it with an ornery, satisfied grin. "No one’s taking my guns," he’ll say.

This might be a good time for me to add that no one’s taking my guns either. Period. And if Dianne Feinstein orders me from her lofty perch on the left-coast to retroactively register them with some federal autocracy, I think I might just forget I even have them. Tens of millions of law-abiding, God-fearing Americans just like me and Dad, I suspect, feel the same way.

I love guns. Grew up with ‘em. As a former police officer with 12 years in the U.S. military, I know how to use them, too - use them well. I plan to buy more - a bunch more. In fact, who’s to say I don’t already have a veritable arsenal?

Point is, tain’t Big Brother Barack’s nor any other candy-keistered-iberal-cream-puff’s bloody business whether I do or not.

See, the left’s totalitarian brand of "gun control" has nothing to do with controlling guns - or bad guys. Rather, it has everything to do with controlling - disarming - the law-abiding masses. It’s not about protecting the innocents. It’s about rendering the innocents defenseless.

Clichés become clichés for a reason, and the old cliché, "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns," rings as true today as it did whenever it was that some homespun fellow coined it.

I was disgusted - physically sickened, in fact - when Barack Obama, president of these Divided States of America, shamelessly exploited the Sandy Hook memorial service to lay the groundwork for his unconstitutional gun-confiscation scheme. It was slimy to the extreme.

I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised. That’s what liberals do. Every time some evil nut-job - pumped full of psychotropic drugs by NEA members who don’t want to "Now, finally, now!" they say, rubbing together soft hands that have never felt the surprising weight of a Sig Sauer 45. "This time we have the political momentum for sweeping gun control. This time the American people will roll over and let us trample the Second Amendment beneath jackbooted executive order or congressional fiat."

"Let no good crisis go to waste," right, Rahm?

Well, not so fast, cupcake. As the U.S. Constitution guarantees - and as the Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed - "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It ain’t, "should not be infringed," or "shall finally be infringed once 'progressives' have assumed total dominance."

No, "shall not" means shall not.

There’s only one way to take my guns, Slick, and that’s through a constitutional amendment - an amendment that will never happen - ever. Try it any other way and we have a problem.

And this whole "assault weapons ban" angle? Sensation A-list propaganda. I prefer to call them "defense weapons." Contrary to left-wing revisionist pabulum, the Second Amendment’s not about squirrel hunting.

Notice a trend here? What do Sandy Hook Elementary, Aurora Colorado’s Century 16 theater and Columbine have in common? They’re all "gun free zones."

Places you don’t see mass murder and mayhem? Well, there’s a reason bad guys largely avoid shooting-up gun shows, ranges, households with signs that say: "This home insured by Smith & Wesson" and Texas in general. It’s because they know - even while thick-skulled liberals don’t - that, as recently noted by the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre, "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
Oh, that rather than "gun free zone," Sandy Hook had a sign reading: "Staff heavily armed and trained. Any attempts to harm those herein will be met with deadly force." Might some of those beautiful babies have still died if the P.E. coach and four MP5-bearing teachers had ended the bloodshed soon after it began? Perhaps. But how many precious lives could have been saved?

No, you won’t disarm me. You’re not going to neuter my household and tear away my ability to defend my wife and precious babies like Dad did all those years ago.

I really, really hope this president and his authoritarian cohorts in Congress will slow down, take a deep breath and realize that, right now, they’re playing a very dangerous game of chicken. If they try what I think they might, but hope they don’t, I fear this nation - already on the precipice of widespread civil unrest and economic disaster - might finally spiral into to utter chaos, into a second civil war.

But then again, that may be exactly what they have in mind.
About the author: Matt Barber

Matt Barber served as Policy Director for Cultural Issues with Concerned Women for America before joining Liberty University School of Law in 2008. In addition to his Juris Doctorate degree, Dean Barber holds a Master of Arts in Public Policy from Regent University and a Bachelor of Science in Organizational Management from Colorado Christian University.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, January 04, 2013


Gun Control. Why is this so important an issue that stirs such passion? Because throughout history as the first video records governments have murdered millions. Communist China, Russia, Nazi Germany, Pol Pot- Cambodia. Once the government outlaws guns for it's citizens, the population is at the mercy of goverments that turn on their citizens. "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson. Founding Father U.S.A., drafted the Declaration of Independence.

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." Thomas Jefferson.(Quoting Cesare Beccaria)

We must remember according to Jefferson that "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." Gun control is part of the process of the government turning tyrannical against it's own citizens.

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson.


We must re-learn a lesson that our forefathers paid dearly for. That Freedom is not free. There is a cost. "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."(Jefferson) So ignore the globalist controlled media hype for gun control. Remember their aim: to control you not the criminal. Gun control does not work! History has proven this time and time again. Let us not forget!

Personaly I like the words of Corporal Joshua Boston.

A United States Marine veteran has penned a response to California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s gun control proposal, saying the government has no right to take away his weapon: "I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve."

It is always about their will to control you.

Former U.S. Marines Cpl. Joshua Boston wrote a letter to Feinstein regarding her assault weapons ban, a proposal announced in the wake of the Newtown, Connecticut, shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School that left 20 children, aged 6 and 7, dead.
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.
Perhaps Charlton Heston said it best:

"You can have my guns when you take them from my cold, dead hands. Charlton Heston speaking on behalf of the National Rifle Association in their campaign to stop the global collectivists from banning firearms in the United States.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?