Sunday, February 25, 2007
"The US Military, not al Qaeda, had the access to plant explosives inside its own most heavily defended world headquarters, the Pentagon. The US military, not al Qaeda, had the access to plant the explosives Willy Rodriguez heard and felt go off deep in the sub-basement of the World Trade Center. The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC 2, and in WTC 7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11. The US military, not al Qaeda, had access to the sulfur-enhanced military-grade thermite (thermate) detected in the sub-basement levels of the WTC needed to melt the steel found molten three weeks later. The US military, not al Qaeda, would have chosen the least populated and most reinforced section of the Pentagon-its newly upgraded west wedge-to strike, minimizing casualties. Real terrorists would have maximized them. A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high speed 270-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had access to the weaponized, military-grade US army "Ames Strain" anthrax contained in letters mailed only to Democratic Congressional leaders. It is absurd to believe that al Qaeda would target only Democrats, especially as the US leadership at the time of 9/11 was Republican. When he received the anthrax letter dated September 11, then Senate Democratic leader Thomas Daschle was calling for a Congressional investigation of 9/11 and had already been warned off from "looking to closely at" 9/11 by both President Bush and Vice President Cheney. When he received his anthrax letter, another Democratic leader, Senator Patrick Leahy, was leading the Congressional resistance to the PATRIOT Act, the assault on Americans' privacy and civil liberties justified by "al Qaeda's" attack, clearly drafted by the Bush Administration before 9/11 and "in the can" awaiting its "trigger event."
And who in the US military chain of command and US civilian leadership are among the prime suspects for these acts of High Treason? First and foremost are the signers of the pre-9/11 Project for a New American Century (PNAC) manifesto calling for a "new Peal Harbor" to catalyze its global domination agenda, including Vice President Dick Cheney; former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld; then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz; Richard Perle, then head of Secretary Rumfeld's Defense Policy Board; Jerry Hauer, the federal government's top bio-terrorism expert who took anti-anthrax Cipro to the White House on 9/11; and then National Security Council Middle East advisor Zalmay Khalilzad, soon to be the first US ambassador to Iraq-the very two countries whose invasions were rationalized as retaliation for the 9/11 attacks. During the Cold War, Khalilzad was a liaison to then CIA "bag man" Osama bin Laden in the CIA's covert war against the Soviets in Afghanistan, the crucible from which al Qaeda emerged."(1)
"We know that mere incompetence cannot explain the systematic failure of the normal security protections codified in both the civilian aviation and military sectors and we know that not one single person has yet been reprimanded for this failure. Why did it take a year or more to learn that Cheney's antiterrorism task force was alerted to the problem, that President Bush saw a briefing paper stating that bin Laden was preparing to strike in August 2001, and that war game exercises involving the idea of planes crashing into buildings were scheduled for 9/11?"(2)
"In the case of the Pearl Harbor attack, the JFK assassination and 9/11, a common denominator was the failure of normal security precautions. This is the tip off.
As Col. L. Fletcher Prouty, former Pentagon-CIA liaison officer, stated in regards to the Kennedy assassination, 'The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. That is why President Kennedy was killed. He was not murdered by some lone gunman or by some limited conspiracy, but by the breakdown of the protective system that should have made assassination impossible... This is the greatest single clue to the assassination-who had the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions that are always in effect whenever a president travels? Castro did not kill Kennedy, nor did the CIA. The power source that arranged that murder was on the inside. It had the means to reduce normal security and permit the choice of a hazardous route. It also had the continuing power to cover the crime for ....years.'
The same questions could be asked regarding the tragedies of September 11, 2001:
Who had the power to call off or reduce normal airline and NORAD security procedures and who had the power to deflect any meaningful investigation into the events? This kind of power can only be found at the highest levels of government and corporate control. Today's big time criminals no longer worry about what the government might do to them because they are the government. It therefore becomes essential to identify and connect the inner core elite of the world' secret societies, to demonstrate their ownership and interlocking control over the multi-national corporations that dominate our national life."(3)
"The United States today is under the control of a dynastic family, blood relatives to virtually all European monarchs, whose patriarch can be shown to have been both in sympathy and in business with Hitler and his Nazis. The Bushes control three of the nation's most populous and powerful states-Florida, Colorado, and Texas, as Gov. Rick Perry is considered little more than a surrogate Bush. Considering the close connections between Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Bushes, Karl Rove and other New World Order luminaries, one could argue that they control California.
And the Bushes are blood relatives to the royal family of England, as were Al Gore and John Kerry as documented by the prestigious genealogical publication Bure's Peerage. The Windsors originated in Germany and trace their ancestry to many European royals.
The Bush family has been involved with the CIA since before the time of the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, with that implies regarding covert wars, drug smuggling and assassinations, not to mention creation of Saddam Hussein as well as Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network. One would imagine that the public would finally catch on after realizing that the same family financed three major world evildoers-Hitler, Hussein and bin Laden.
And each generation has belonged to a secret college society linked to the Bavarian Illuminati as well as prominent members of other such societies whose avowed purpose is end United States sovereignty in favor of globalism. The family has even been linked to accused assassins, John Hinckley, and Lee Harvey Oswald. What are the odds?
At least two Bush sons were at the heart of the savings & loan debacle, which cost every man, woman and child in the United States thousands of dollars. The eldest son, not elected but selected by a Supreme Court packed by previous Republican presidents including his father, has been linked to Enron, Harken and other shady oil company dealings and has surrounded himself with men of questionable ethics and truthfulness.
Collectively, this family and their corporate cronies are today seeking what amounts to dictatorial powers to combat the proclaimed War on Terrorism, despite growing evidence that the attacks which launched this war were known in advance and allowed to happen to bring about the erosion of individual rights and the centralization of even more power unto themselves."(4)
"'Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all,' noted internet commentator Michael Rivero."(5)
If after reading this account you do not question the "official" version of 9/11 then you have been seduced by the matrix.
Steve
ourfutureworld.blogspot.com
(1)Barbara Honegger, M.S., The Pentagon Attack Papers, Seven Hours in September: The Clock That Broke the Lie in Jim Marrs, The Terror Conspiracy, Deception, 9/11, And The Loss of Liberty,(New York, NY: The Disinformation Company, 2006), p.459-460.
(2)Marrs, p.396, 397.
(3)Ibid. p.400, 401.
(4)Ibid. p.402, 403.
(5)Ibid. p.401.
Comments:
Post a Comment
