Sunday, May 24, 2009
Click the link above to see examples of government harassment of U.S. citizens; the beginning of the road to tyranny and implementation of the fascist police state.
The pace of events since Obama has been elected has been almost as blindingly fast as it was after Hitler's Machtergreifung and the consolidation of fascist power in 1933. Speed stuns and silences. We would do well to study Hitler's rise to power since it mirrors recent historical events in the United States.
Now we turn our attention to regionalization of the world and the part it plays in the coming Satanic world union.
"Former United Nations Assistant-Secretary General, Robert Muller, expressed the following to a group of educators and students during the 1997 Global Citizenship 2000 youth congress:
'Let us create regional continental units...... the European Union, which I've been pushing too-- and this is how you got the trade agreement between the US and Canada(NAFTA)'".(1)"Professor Phillip Born, writing on this issue more than a decade ago, warned of regionalism within the larger international context:
'The European Community will be transformed into an all-European Union. So, too, the America's will be transformed into an integrated region of the new global order...."(Italics and emphasis mine) What is new is the drive and determination to develop common markets for political (italics mine) economic integration. Correspondingly, there is the determination to institutionalize (italics mine) interdependence: a new global order through regional, bilateral and multilateral regulations... and through joint parliamentary bodies.'" (Italics in original unless otherwise noted)(2)The plan is for a new North American Parliament by the year 2012.
These statements represent the driving force behind the move for globalization of the world economies.
What is that driving force? We can get a clue from a description written in 1957 by Alice Bailey, leader of the House of Theosophy who wrote that the world must first be reorganized (italics mine) into "Spheres of Influence" before it could be organized into a global government.(3)
The occult goal therefore is a global government formed by regionalization of sovereign nations into various trading blocks (NAFTA) and joint parliamentary bodies (The European Parliament). In short A "New World Order".
This world union, global government consisting of a 10 kingdom confederation (Club of Rome 1973), spoken of by the prophet Daniel(Daniel 7:23,24) and John(Revelation 17:12,13) is growing well past its infancy and into adolescence. We are alive to witness its movement into maturity.
The rulers of these final 10 kingdoms will give their allegiance and power to a single world ruler embodied in the Antichrist who will be indwelt by Satan at the end of this current age. "The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast (Antichrist). They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast." Revelation 17:12,13 NIV.
In fact Satan's plan is to produce a counterfeit to Christ's millennial reign at the end of this present age. A future utopia on earth referred to by the occult as the "Golden Age". This is the vision of Henry Kissinger (former Secretary of State), Zbigniew Brezinski (founder of the Trilateral Commission and Obama foreign policy advisor), Bill Clinton, Robert Muller (former U.N. Assistant Secretary- General), and Ted Turner.
These ten kings arise from the fourth world kingdom that appears on the earth. It is explained to Daniel thus "The fourth beast is a fourth kingdom that will appear on earth. It will be different from all the other kingdoms" (Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greecian, and Roman) "and will devour the whole earth, trampling it down and crushing it. The ten horns are 10 kings who will come from this kingdom." Daniel 7:23, 24a NIV.
In Daniel, chapter 7:7 we read, "After that in my vision at night I looked, and there before me was a fourth beast--terrifying and frightening, and very powerful. It had large iron teeth; it crushed and devoured its victims and trampled underfoot whatever was left. It was different from all the former beasts, and it had ten horns."
The article I have linked to at the top of the page illustrates this new hatred of the American population by our government and the erosion of our rights guaranteed by our constitution and Bill of Rights.
This change in attitude merely reflects the coming world power that is "terrifying and frightening, and very powerful" which crushes and devours its victims, which will devour the whole earth, trampling it down.
Certainly our rights are being crushed and trampled on daily and they are being devoured at an alarming speed.
Satan knows his time is short!
Through occult channelers such as Alice Bailey, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky; groups such as Lucis Trust, The Theosophical Society, the Triangle networks and various New Age groups the ascended masters (Satan and his demons) are implementing their plan for world government moving it forward in every country on the world stage simultaneously.
"These methods of overshadowing will largely be the ones used by the Great Lord and his Masters at the end of the century, and for this reason They are sending into incarnation, in every country, disciples who have the opportunity offered them to respond to the need of training men and woman to recognize the higher psych ism, and the true inspiration and mediumship, and to do this scientifically. In fifty years time, the need for true psychics and conscious mediums (such as H.P.B.,[Helena Petrova Blavatsky]) will be very great if the Masters' plans are to be carried through to fruition, and the movement must be set on foot in preparation for the coming of Him for Whom all nations wait."(The Antichrist)(4)"As early as 1889 Blavatsky purportedly had told a group of Theosophical students that the real purpose of establishing the Society was to prepare humanity for the reception of the World Teacher when he appeared again on earth."
These statements reflect a spiritual battle occurring between the spiritual forces in the heavenly realms and the powers of this dark world.
"How art thou, fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee saying. Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; that made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof;" Isaiah 14:12-17a KJV.
The bible tells us in John 12:31 and John 14:30 that Satan is "prince of this world."
Ephesians 6:12 states "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.".[emphasis mine]. Luke 4:6,7 states "And he said to him, 'I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. So if you worship me"(Satan), "it will all be yours.'"(note Satan's pride) "Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.'"
Some quotes from Alice Bailey which illustrate the plan for our world that the globalists are following.
“The new world order must meet the immediate need and not be an attempt to satisfy some distant, idealistic vision. The new world order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience."(such as a worldwide ecomonic depression, world war, currency collapse etc., sound familiar?) "The new world order must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding."
"In the preparatory period for the new world order there will be a steady and regulated disarmament. It will not be optional. No nation will be permitted to produce and organize any equipment for destructive purposes or to infringe the security of any other nation."
"The new world order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis..."
"We are concerned with only one subject, the ushering in of the new world order."
"...the present world order (which is today largely disorder) can be so modified and changed that a new world and a new race of men can gradually come into being. Renunciation and the use of the sacrificial will should be the keynote for the interim period after the war (WWII), prior to the inauguration of the New Age.”
Are you surprised by the material presented here?
You shouldn't be. It explains everything. A spiritual battle is raging for control of this earth which will only intensify as the 10 kingdom confederation takes form.
Whose power will you rely on when your rights are taken away? Will it be one of the ascended masters or Jesus Christ?
As for me and my house we will serve the Lord,(Jesus Christ).
"Therefore, since through God's mercy we have this ministry, we do not loose heart. Rather, we have renounced secret and shameful ways;" (Are you a Mason who worships the god of forces?) "we do not use deception, nor do we distort the word of God. On the contrary, by setting forth the truth plainly we commend ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God. And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. The God of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord." 2 Corinthians 4:1-5 NIV.
"We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed but not in dispair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed. We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. For we who are alive are always being given over to death for Jesus sake, so that his life may be revealed in our mortal body." 2 Corinthians 4:8-11 NIV.
"It is written:'I believed; therefore I have spoken.' With that same spirit of faith we also believe and therefore speak, because we know that the one who raised the Lord Jesus form the dead will also raise us with Jesus and present us with you in his presence." 2 Corinthians 4:13-15 NIV.
"Therefore we do not loose heart. Though outwardly we are wasting away, yet inwardly we are being renewed day by day. For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all. So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." 2 Corinthians 4:16-18 NIV.
"Let us hold uswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful." Hebrews 10:23 NIV.
"Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another--and all the more as you see the Day approaching." Hebrews 10:25 NIV.
1, Carl Teichrib, Hope For The World Update, (Noblesville, Indiana: Hope For The World, Summer 2003)
2. Ibid.
3. Alice A. Bailey, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy (New York: Lucis Press, formerly The Lucifer Publishing Company, 1957) 209.
4. Alice A. Bailey, Treatise on Cosmic Fire (New York: Lusic Press, 1982) 757-758.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
A towering citadel housing what is essentially a sovereign state known as the Bank for International Settlements is located in Basel, Switzerland.
The bank now controls the financial affairs of planet Earth.
If you think this is an exaggeration or the conspiratorial ramblings of the author . . . or not, I invite you to read on.
I wrote the first installment of this article— "The Financial Crisis: A Look Behind the Wizard’s Curtain"—in mid-March of this year.
The article included the following statement:
The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the United States and the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority—a planetary financial control organization "to ensure this never happens again."[emphasis in original, Steve]
This purpose has now been accomplished.
The dollar, the former king of currencies, now goes begging in the pant-suited persona of Hillary Clinton to our creditors at the Chinese Communist Party.
Almost unthinkable a few short years ago, the U.S. dollar is fast losing its status as the world reserve currency, and any thought of saving it is being nuked by the Larry, Moe and Curly of U.S. economic policy - Bernanke, Geithner and Summers - and their Alice in Wonderland trillion-dollar budget deficits.
I would not be surprised to see central banks start using the renminbi (the currency of the newly awakened People’s Republic of China—also called the yuan) for international trade and reserves in the not too distant future. This prediction will likely be scoffed at by global economists, but then they have about as much credibility as pharmaceutical salesmen these days.
A more generally discussed alternative is the International Monetary Fund’s SDR (which stands for Special Drawing Rights). There is no production or property behind the SDR. It is one of those clown currencies that are made up out of thin air—a magic trick central bankers like to do. Intoxicated by the power of the purse, they think of themselves as fiscal alchemists.
But the dollar has seen its glory. It can return one day, if Washington ever finds its financial backbone. But let’s be real, with the exception of a very few, like Ron Paul in the House and Tom Coburn in the Senate, these folks are addicted to spending like junkies on horse.
More importantly, the other shoe has dropped. Like some ghoulish predator from another Alien sequel, a Global Monetary Authority has been born. It lives.
On April 2, 2009, the members of the G-20 (a loose-knit organization of the central bankers and finance ministers of the 20 major industrialized nations) issued a communiqué that gave birth to what is no less than Big Brother in a three-piece suit.
Which means? . . .
The communiqué announced the creation of the all too Soviet sounding Financial Stability Board (FSB)—and no, I’m not going to make a crack about the fact that this acronym is the same as that of the Russian intelligence service that replaced the KGB.
The Financial Stability Board. Remember that name well, because they now have control of the planet’s finances . . . and, when one peels the onion of the communiqué, control of much, much more.
The FSB morphed into existence from an earlier incarnation called the Financial Stability Forum. The Financial Stability Forum (FSF) was established in 1999 to promote international financial stability through co-operation in financial supervision and surveillance. Since it had done such a wonderful job, the central bankers decided to expand its powers and give it a new name.
A board sounds like it has more authority than a forum. But the name change isn’t the problem. The FSB’s broadened mandate includes under point 5, “As obligations of membership, member countries and territories commit to pursue the maintenance of financial stability, maintain the openness and transparency of the financial sector, implement international financial standards (including the 12 key International Standards and Codes), and agree to undergo periodic peer reviews, using among other evidence IMF/World Bank public Financial Sector Assessment Program reports.”
Rather a mouthful of elitist banker-speak. But, as a friend of mine is fond of saying, "he Devil is in the details."
While several press releases from the G-20’s London conclave reference these codes as though they were handed down from a fiscal Mount Sinai, finding the specifics takes some digging.
But then the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), out of which the FSB operates, has never seen transparency as one of its core values. In fact, given its fascist pedigree, transparency hasn’t been a value at all. Known as Hitler’s bank, the Bank for International Settlements worked arm in arm with the Nazis, facilitating the transfer of gold from Nazi-occupied countries to the Reichsbank, and kept their lines open to the international financial community during the Second World War.
As noted in the first article, the BIS is completely above the law.
It is like a sovereign state. Its personnel have diplomatic immunity for their persons and papers. No taxes are levied on the bank or the personnel’s salaries. The grounds are sovereign, as are the buildings and offices. The Swiss government has no legal jurisdiction over the bank and no government agency or authority has oversight over its operations.
In a 2003 article titled "Contolling the World’s Monetary System the Bank for International Settlements," Joan Veon wrote:
"The BIS is where all of the world’s central banks meet to analyze the global economy and determine what course of action they will take next to put more money in their pockets, since they control the amount of money in circulation and how much interest they are going to charge governments and banks for borrowing from them. . . .
"Wen you understand that the BIS pulls the strings of the world’s monetary system, you then understand that they have the ability to create a financial boom or bust in a country. If that country is not doing what the money lenders want, then all they have to do is sell its currency."
And if you don’t find that troubling, a close reading of the new powers of the FSB are chilling.
The 12 key International Standards and Codes, which are minimum requirements, contain such things as:
clear specification of the structure and functions of government;
statistical and data gathering from ministries of education, health, finance and other agencies;
corporate governance principles;
shareholder rights;
personal savings;
secure retirement incomes;
international accounting standards to be observed in the preparation of financial statements;
international standards of auditing;
securities settlement;
foreign exchange settlement;
minimal capital adequacy for banks;
risk management;
ratification and implementation of UN instruments; and
criminalizing the financing of terrorism.
“Sounds oppressive,” you say; “but I don’t really care what a bunch of bankers do in Basel, Switzerland. It’s got nothing to do with me.” But I am writing this to tell you that it has everything to do with you, your family, your business, your country, and—if you’re up to it—your planet.[emphasis mine, Steve]
Because as currently structured, the dictates of the Financial Stability Board will impact your life without any say-so on your part whatsoever. Here’s one example from an article written by former Clinton advisor and political strategist Dick Morris in an article for The Bulletin on April 6, 2009.
"The FSB is also charged with 'implementing . . . tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms.'
"That means that the FSB will regulate how much executives are to be paid and will enforce its idea of corporate social responsibility at 'all firms.'"
You begin to see what’s involved here.
You see, these standards and codes are commitments, obligations and requirements, not merely advice. The strategy, policies and regulations of the FSB are worked out at the senior levels of the bank. They are approved by the plenary and implemented through the national representatives.
The plenary, in this sense, is the complete membership body of the FSB. And the membership, my friends—the national representatives who implement these policies—just happen to be the heads of the planet’s more powerful central banks. And in case it slipped your mind, most central banks are private institutions and answerable to no one.
Take our central bank, the Federal Reserve Bank. Yes, the chairman is appointed by the President and often testifies before Congress, but there is virtually no public control over the institution. It can’t be audited nor can Congress tell it what to do. It is not really accountable to anyone. The idea that the Fed is a government agency subject to the control of Congress is a PR line. It is simply not true.
Among other things, central banks govern a country’s monetary policy and create (print) the country’s money.
They make income by charging interest on the money they loan to the government.
Watch this, because if you blink, you’ll miss it.
Governments are perpetually in debt. They are always borrowing money. They have a mental disorder that prevents them from spending less than they collect in taxes—BDD, Budget Deficit Disorder.[emphasis mine, Steve] And if it looks like they might balance the books some year, why, someone can always start a war.
Here’s an example.
Let’s say the annual budget calls for the U.S. government to spend $2.5 trillion. But the income will only be $2 trillion. They’re going to be a little short. But no worries, they have the ultimate credit card—a debt limit that they themselves control. If they borrow up to the established limit, they can just vote it higher—which they have done to the tune of a cool $11.2 trillion dollars.
The Fed loves this.
Listen as the Secretary of the Treasury calls the Chairman of the Fed.
"Ben. It’s Tim."
"Dude. What’s happening?"
"I need a little bread. Friggin’ Taliban again."
"No problem, Timbo. How much you looking for?"
"Five hundred big ones."
"Ben licks his lips. "Anything for you, big guy. Send me the notes and I’m down with the five hundred. Five percent work for you"
"Whatever."
So the Treasury prints up $500 billion dollars’ worth of IOUs—they are called Treasury bills (short term), notes (medium term) or bonds (long term)—and sends them over to the Fed with a fifth of Chivas.
In the old days, the Fed would print the cash. These days, they click a mouse.
Now here’s the part where you aren’t allowed to blink.
When the Fed prints the money or clicks the mouse, they have no money themselves. They are just creating it out of thin air. They just print it, or send it digitally. And then they charge interest on the money they lent to the Treasury. A hundred-dollar bill costs $0.04 to print. But the interest is charged on the $100. Go ahead: read it again; the words won’t change.
The interest on the national debt last year was $451,154,049,950.63. That’s $1.23 billion a day. These are the same people that are now running our banks, insurance companies and automobile manufacturers.
Reason weeps.
Sure, I oversimplified it. The Fed doesn’t own all the debt and they do some other things. But these are the basics. That is how a central bank works.
It is the heads of the planet’s central banks and some finance ministers that make up the membership of the FSB.
In brief, here’s how it works: the Board’s leadership provides strategies, policies and regulations to the membership. The members vote on the matters and then see to their implementation in their respective countries.
FSB leadership is in the hands of the chairman, Mario Draghi. Mr. Draghi is also the governor of Italy’s central bank. He is a former executive director of the World Bank and like his comrade in international finance Henry Paulson—the former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who bludgeoned Congress out of the first $700 billion bailout package—Draghi was a managing director of Goldman Sachs until 2006. Like Paulson, he left Goldman in 2006, a year before the financial crisis exploded: Paulson went to Washington to run the U.S. Treasury; Draghi went to Rome to run Italy’s financial system as well as the Financial Stability Forum (forerunner to the Financial Stability Board).
Let’s call it government by Goldman, shall we?
More to the point, you may have noticed that you weren’t consulted on this setup. Neither was Congress. In other words, the command channel for implementing global financial strategies goes from the FSB leadership to its central banker members and from them to the world’s financial institutions. You don’t get a peek, neither does Congress, nor, for that matter, does the White House.
And while there may be some accountability in some of the member countries, by and large these central bankers have the authority to implement these regulations and strategies. And they are held responsible by the FSB to do so.
In short, on April 2, 2009, the President signed a communiqué that essentially turns over financial control of the country, and the planet, to a handful of central bankers, who, besides dictating policy covering everything from your retirement income to shareholder rights, will additionally have access to your health and education records.
There is also this troubling little line about “clear specification of the structure and functions of government.” What the hell is that suppose to mean?
There is no oversight here. Not by you, not by Congress, not by anybody. No oversight over a handful of central bankers who operate out of a clandestine organization that is above the law and is responsible for having implemented and enforced the “standards” that froze world credit markets and precipitated the worst financial crisis in the planet’s history[emphasis mine, Steve] (see “The Financial Crisis: A Look Behind the Wizard’s Curtain”).
I haven’t heard word one out of Congress about this, but I’m afraid they are a few clowns short of a circus up there.
Which begs the question, what do we do about this?
There are two critical things that need to be done.
The first lies in the fact that the communiqué signed by the President is an agreement that is binding on the United States and, as such, requires approval by Congress. If classed as a Treaty, it requires approval by two-thirds of the Senate. At the very least, approval should be by Congressional Executive Agreement, which requires a majority of both houses of Congress.
The agreement signed in London on April 2 has been called a New Bretton Woods (Bretton Woods being the location of a meeting of world leaders toward the end of the Second World War, which gave birth to the international financial organizations the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund). The original Bretton Woods agreement was put in place as a Congressional Executive Agreement. So this “new Bretton Woods” should at least do the same.
But this step is just to get Congress to recognize their responsibility here. The Federal Reserve Act, the bill that established the Federal Reserve System, was passed in 1913 two nights before Christmas by a sparsely attended Congress.
People have been complaining about this ever since.
What do you say we don’t let this happen again? Not on our watch. Congress needs to understand that it has a responsibility to approve any agreement signed by the President that is binding on this nation.
But the point is not to get Congress to approve what has been done. It is to first get them to recognize that agreements have been made that affect our entire financial system and that it is their responsibility to shape these agreements in a way that is beneficial to our Republic AND to provide a mechanism for real oversight of this international body.
Central bankers should not be making decisions about international finance without oversight and a system of checks and balances that are reflective of those provided by a republican form of government.
I am, of course, not talking about a political party here. No, no. I’m talking about the American form of government where citizens elect others to represent them.
A republican form of government is one that is operated by representatives chosen by the people.
Congress must step up to the plate. They must insist that the Financial Stability Board be ratified either by Treaty or Congressional Executive Agreement. And that ratification must include the creation of a body with oversight and corrective powers that is comprised of representatives of all the nations involved who are chosen from each country’s elected officials.
There is nothing inherently evil about an international financial organization. As much as we might protest it, it is a global world today, and a body that oversees the smooth flow and interchange of currencies and other financial instruments is needed in today’s world.
But the organization cannot be controlled by international bankers who are not answerable to the citizens of the countries in which they operate. It should be overseen by a senior level group which itself is organized as a liberal republic, following the original model of the United States.
Why? Because the system of government originally created by the United States has been the most successful form of government in man’s history. Any problems with the system have come about as a result of deviations from the original structure—a representative form of government with adequate checks and balances.
Such a body could help create an international economic system in which those that want to be successful can be so. It would also allow them to take an active role in controlling their futures by effectively participating in the legislative process.
ACT!
Let your Representatives and Senators know: the Financial Stability Board must be approved by Congress and must be subject to oversight by elected officials of the countries involved.
Personal visits, followed by calls and faxes to both Washington and local offices, are the most effective. Don’t be surprised if they don’t know what you’re talking about. Politely insist they find out and take action. And understand this when dealing with legislators or their staffs: they are focused almost exclusively on legislation that has already been introduced—a bill with a number on it.
That is not the case here. You want them to take action on this matter by introducing legislation that brings the approval and structure of the Financial Stability Board under congressional control.
This can be accomplished.
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.” —Thomas Jefferson
Find your elected officials here:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
Bruce
bdwiseman@earthlink.net
www.Brucewiseman.net
Copyright © 2009 Bruce Wiseman
Thursday, May 07, 2009
Why all the media hype about the swine flu?
Please download the links to understand as explained briefly below.
In an article written by Harold Gray, May 7, 2009 as summarized by Alex Jones titled "Hyped Flu Will Make Use Of Expiring Tamiflu Stockpiles And Allow For Pre-Pandemic Priming Of The Population" he states that the phase 5 pandemic declaration by the WHO, has allowed numerous entities to enact self-serving solutions that otherwise couldn’t have been achieved. First, the hyped crisis officially authorized the use of Tamiflu stockpiles around the globe that are due to expire in 2009-2010. Secondly, the hysteria that emerged from the media hype and government fearmongering, has also allowed for the implementation of a long term plan by vaccine manufacturers, governmental institutions, and virology think-tanks, to use investigational pre-pandemic vaccines to prime the public in advance of a threatened outbreak of a novel hybrid virus.
Harold Gray summarizes his article with the following statement: "This compiled data proves that we are in the midst of a global pandemic beta test, that will lead to an attempt in the fall to mass vaccinate the populace." (My emphasis)
"This hoax, whether manufactured or taking advantage of, has enabled all aspects of the New World Order agenda to move forward. Resulting in more control, record profits and the opportunity to pose as the savior for the crisis, justifying the role of global government and all the compartmentalized tentacles that extend from it."
Note that in the coming planned for pandemic likely to occur this fall former President Bush put the U.S. under the control of The World Health Organization during a pandemic.
On May 4, 2006 The Washington Post published an article titled "White House Plan Defers Leadership In Bird-Flu Fight" which stated:
Bush administration plan for an influenza pandemic released yesterday hinges on sharing authority with global agencies such as the World Health Organization, and, at the opposite end of the spectrum, with governors, mayors and school superintendents.
