FUTURE WORLD

FINAL WARNING

David Allen Rivera has written a block-buster book titled: Final Warning: A History of the New World Order currently only available from Amazon.com.

He has also presented the findings of his research with a Power Point presentation at the Prophecy Club which can be viewed here.

In it he describes the plan by the Club of Rome for population reduction and origins of the HIV/AIDS Virus.

In April, 1968 a think-tank of financiers, scientists, economists, politicians, heads of state, and industrialists from ten different countries, again met at Rockefeller's private estate in Bellagio, Italy, at the request of Aurelio Peccei, the Italian industrialist who had close ties to Fiat and the Olivetti Corporation. He claimed to have solutions for world peace and prosperity, which could be accomplished through world government. The Club of Rome (COR) was established with a membership of 75 prominent scientists, industrialists, and economists from 25 countries, which along with the Bilderberg, have become one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Round Table group.

The first Club of Rome conference in the U.S. was in 1969, where the American branch was organized as the "American Association of the Club of Rome."

Note that Rockefeller hosted the first meeting in 1968. The United Nations' 18 acres of prime Manhattan land was donated by the Rockefeller family (the CFR's chairman is David Rockefeller). The Rockefellers have funded the eugenics movement for many years donating over $500,000 to Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic research institutions in the 1920's.

That first conference of the Club of Rome in the U.S. consisted of people who head organizations affiliated with New Age religion, the NOW organization, the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) and a U.S senator and representative.

The Club of Rome's first book titled "The Limits to Growth" was published in 1972 and dealt with the problem of worldwide overpopulation.

On September 17, 1973, they released a Report called the "Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System" which was prepared by Directors Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel as part of the "Strategy for Survival Project". This revealed the Club's goal of dividing the world into ten political/economic regions... which would unite the entire world under a single form of government. These regions are: North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Japan, Rest of Developed World, Latin America, Middle East, Rest of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and China.

Note that on the Club of Rome map, the United States and Canada are merged as region #1. The merging of the United States and Canada took a giant leap forward in January 2003 with the publishing of the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative (NSPI) by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. This is the document and organization which initiated the implementation of what is known as the North American Union.

The same plan was published in a Club of Rome book called "Mankind at the Turning Point", which said:

"The solution of these crises can be developed only in a global context with full and explicit recognition of the emerging world system and on a long-term basis. This would necessitate, among other changes, a new world economic order and a global resources allocation system..."

In 1976, they published RIO: Reshaping the International Order which called for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.

During the Carter Administration, a task force was appointed to expand upon this report, and on July 24, 1980, a two-volume document called "Global 2000 Report," which had been written by former Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance, was presented to President Carter, and then Secretary of State Edward S. Muskie. It attempted to project global economic trends for the next twenty years, and indicated that the resources of the planet were not sufficient enough to support the expected dramatic increase in the world population. The report called for the population of the U.S. to be reduced by 100 million people by the year 2050.

Howard T. Odum, a marine biologist at the University of Florida, who is a member of the Club of Rome, was quoted in the August, 1980 edition of Fusion magazine, as saying: "It is necessary that the United States cut its population by two-thirds within the next 50 years." He didn't say how this would be accomplished.

About six months later, the Council on Environmental Quality made recommendations based on the Report, called "Global Future: A Time to Act." They suggested an aggressive program of population control which included sterilization, contraception and abortion. In August, 1982, the Executive Intelligence Review published a report called "Global 2000: Blueprint for Genocide" which said that the two aforementioned Presidential reports:

"...are correctly understood as political statements of intent- the intent on the part of such policy centers as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the International Monetary Fund, to pursue policies that will result not only in the death of the 120 million cited in the reports, but in the death of upwards of two billion people by the year 2000."

Throughout the world, the Club of Rome has indicated that genocide should be used to eliminate people who they refer to as "useless eaters." This would be accomplished by using limited wars in advanced countries, and even a limited nuclear strike at a strategic location; as well as starvation through created famines and diseases in Third World countries.

Here is a quote from another source, Prince Philip, founder of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), flagship of the modern "environmental" movement:

"Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We're in for a major disaster if it isn't curbed... We have no option. If it isn't controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war."

-- HRH Prince Philip, interview "Vanishing Breeds Worry Prince Philip, But Not as Much as Overpopulation", People Magazine, Dec. 21, 1981.

Here is a report published March 22, 2009 from TIMESONLINE discussing "culling the herd."

JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build sustainable society.

Porritt’s call will come at this week’s annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust(OPT), of which he is patron.

The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m (roughly what it was in late Victorian times) if the country wants to feed itself sustainably.

Porritt said: “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure.

Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year.

“We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder,” he said.

In the 1976 novel "Ceremony of the Innocent" by Taylor Caldwell, she effectively explains the rationale behind their actions:

"...there will be no peace in the tormented world, only a programmed and systematic series of wars and calamities- until the plotters have gained their objective: an exhausted world willing to submit to a planned Marxist economy and total and meek enslavement- in the name of peace."

Based on what has been reviewed so far it can be seen that elitist organizations are behind the drive to drastically reduce the earth's population based on their reports and policy statements and also their financial support over the years of the eugenics movement. Therefore it should be no surprise that they are planning various ways to implement their intention of drastic population reduction.

How will this goal be accomplished? It is their stated intention to use diseases, starvation, and war, as well as sterilization, contraception and abortion, and various other "calamities".

Origins of the HIV/AIDS Virus

Have their plans for genocide already started? [Since the 1970's], the Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) has become a global plague, spreading to 91 nations [and resulting in millions of deaths].

In 1961, at the Litton Bionetics laboratory (who was working with the Navy's Biomedical Research Laboratory, in association with the Univeristy of California), retroviral experiments with African green monkeys and human T-cell leukemia were being conducted under the auspices of the National Institute of Health (contract # SVCP PR#8 NIH #71-2025).

[The experiments] consisted of taking monkey viruses that were harmless to humans, recombining them with DNA, RNA and enzymes from other animal viruses that were known to cause leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas; then causing them to jump species. The new mutant viruses were cultured into human white blood cells in some studies, and in other studies human fetal tissues, which [reportedly] produced "immune-system destroying, cancer-causing viruses". The scientist who was directing the tests was Dr. Robert Gallo.

In 1969 at a House Appropriations hearing, the Defense Department's Biological Warfare unit requested funds to develop, through gene-splicing, a new disease that would be resistant to treatment and break down a victim's immune system. They received $10 million (H.B. 15090), to produce "a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired."

In the 1972 Bulletin of the U.N.'s World Health Organization (WHO), volume 47, it says:
[Recommendation (3):]

"An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the inflicting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."

-- "Virus Associated Immunopathology: Animal models and implications for human disease", WHO Bulletin, 1972, vol 47, no 2, pg 259.

Derivatives from sheep and cattle have been commonly used to manufacture vaccines; however, certain viruses common to these animals can interact forming a new strain of deadly viruses called retro-viruses. In 1974, the National Academy of Sciences recommended that "Scientists throughout the world join with members of this committee in voluntarily deferring experiments (linking) animal viruses."

In 1975, Dr. Robert Gallo and eight other scientists (working at the Bethesda Cancer Research Center in Maryland) had been working to modify the genetic structure of the virus so that it could be more easily transmitted. That same year, after Fort Detrick had become demilitarized, the newly established Frederick Cancer Research Facility was placed under the direction of the Bethesda Cancer Research Center where Gallo was the Director.

One investigation revealed that in March, 1976, a special federal government virus development program began producing the AIDS virus, and it was headed by Dr. Gallo and Dr. Novakhatskiy of the Ivanosku Institute in Russia. Gallo would later be investigated and found guilty of scientific misconduct, but President Clinton pardoned him.

In response to the charges that AIDS was developed as a military biological warfare weapon, in February, 1987, Army Col. David Huxsoll said: "Studies at army laboratories have shown that the AIDS virus would be an extremely poor biological warfare agent." He later denied saying it.

Dr. Robert Strecker, a practicing gastroenterologist with a Ph.D. in pharmacology, who was hired as a consultant to work on a health-care proposal for Security Pacific Bank, said:

"I don't think there is any doubt that AIDS is a man-made problem. The question is whether it was created either accidentally or intentionally. I believe the AIDS virus was requested, predicted, produced, and deployed."

Strecker's research indicated that the AIDS virus was developed by the Frederick Cancer Research Facility of the National Cancer Institute, in cooperation with the WHO, in their laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland (which until 1969 was part of the U.S. Army's germ warfare unit, known as the Army Infectious Disease Unit, or Special Operations Division) by combining bovine (cattle) leukemia virus and visna (sheep) virus, and injecting them into human tissue cultures.

The bovine leukemia virus is lethal to cattle, but not to humans; and the visna virus is deadly to sheep, but not to man. However, when combined, they produce a retro-virus that can change the genetic composition of the cells that they enter. He said:

"If one analyzes the genes of the human AIDS virus and the genes of the bovine leukemia virus of cattle and the visna virus of sheep, and compares them, the genes appear related. How is it possible that the bovine visna virus -- which looks like AIDS and produces an AIDS-like disease, and which produced pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in chimpanzees in 1972 -- has not been analyzed and compared with AIDS ... until 1987 when 'Characterization and Molecular Cloning of Bovine Lente (Latin for 'slow') Virus Related to Human Immunodeficiency Virus' was published in Nature magazine. Matthew Gonda, the author, described a virus that looks like AIDS, named bovine visna virus, and suggested that it was most closely related to AIDS and may well be its precursor."

On August 11, 1988, Ted Strecker, Dr. Strecker's brother was found shot to death in his home in Springfield, Missouri. His death was ruled a suicide. A month later on September 22, 1988, Illinois State Representative Douglas Huff of Chicago was found dead in his home. The autopsy revealed that he died of a stroke as a result of an overdose of cocaine and heroin. Rep. Huff just happened to be a very vocal supporter of Dr. Strecker's work to publicize the AIDS cover-up.
The Beginning of the AIDS Epidemic
The most common theory about the origin of AIDS was that it came from green monkeys in Africa. Yet several virologists have said that the AIDS virus does not occur naturally in any animal. Besides, it would have been statistically impossible to reach the point we are at now, just from a single episode. If the AIDS virus had originated with the monkeys, then the disease would have surfaced with the Pygmies, who are closer to them, and use them as a food source, yet, it appeared first in the cities. Further damaging evidence comes from the fact that AIDS occurred almost simultaneously in the United States, Haiti, Brazil, and Central Africa.

In 1972, there was a vaccination program for smallpox in Africa by the WHO, and some researchers believe that the smallpox vaccination program was used to introduce the [HIV/AIDS] virus into the population. On May 11, 1987, the London Times ran an article called "Smallpox Vaccine 'Triggered AIDS Virus'" written by Science Editor Pearce Wright, who linked the mass vaccination program of the World Health Organization in the 1970's to the outbreak of AIDS, because Central Africa was the focus of the program and has become the most affected area in the world.

While in Africa AIDS is generally regarded as a heterosexual disease, in the United States it has the stigma of being a 'gay' disease. Prior to 1978, there was no sign of the AIDS virus here; yet in 1978, the killer disease struck with a vengeance within the homosexual community. The evidence points to the introduction [via] an experimental Hepatitis B vaccine. In 1969, Dr. W. Schmugner, a Polish physician, who was educated in Russia, came to the United States where he became head of the New York City Blood Bank. He set up guidelines for a Hepatitis vaccine study, and only promiscuous males between the ages of 20 and 40 were included in the study, which has led some to believe that this was how the virus was introduced into the gay population.

In 1978, more than 1,000 [promiscuous homosexual] adult males received an experimental vaccination against Hepatitis B, which was sponsored by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC). With the Hepatitis vaccine, which is not produced from a human tissue culture, it is impossible to have an accidental contamination, which seems to indicate that the AIDS virus was intentionally put in the vaccine. In 1981, the Center for Disease Control reported that 6% of those receiving the Hepatitis vaccine were infected with AIDS, but in 1984, they admitted that it was actually 64%. These Hepatitis vaccine studies are now in the possession of the Justice Department in Washington, DC.

To allow the disease to become entrenched within the population, various facts were covered-up and glossed-over. A great deal of emphasis had been put on the prime cause of AIDS infection being the exchange of body fluid through sexual activity and intravenous drug use, which led to a campaign for the importance of using clean, unused needles, and condoms. The use of a condom does not guarantee protection against the transmission of the AIDS virus. All it takes is one AIDS virion (a complete virus particle with its outer coat intact) and the smallest sperm is 500 times larger that one such virion. In addition, the quality of condoms have become highly suspect, since failure rates of 30-50% have been reported.

The risk of casual contact has been played down, when in fact AIDS is a highly contagious disease which demands that a quarantine be placed on those who suffer from the disease [and that partners of infected persons be notified]. Rather than treat the disease as the epidemic that it is, the government has concerned itself with giving AIDS carriers more rights and more exposure to the general population. There is concrete medical evidence that indicates that the virus can survive up to 7 days on a dry petri dish, and up to 15 days in an aqueous (wet) environment. It can incubate [in the host] 10-15 years before causing any noticeable signs of illness, which means that [a carrier can unknowingly transmit the disease] in that period of time.

A February, 1985 report in the British medical journal Lancet, said: "There is little evidence for homosexual activity among African AIDS patients (and it) appears to be transmitted through heterosexual contact or exposure to blood through insect bites..." On September 9, 1985, a research team of researchers from the National Cancer Institute, the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology and the Institute of Tropical Medicine, said that "human retroviruses could be transmitted by mosquitoes or within the parasite itself." In a report published in the October, 1981, issue of Science, Boston hematologist Dr. Jerome Groopman, and researchers with the National Institute of Health said that recovery of the AIDS virus "from saliva suggests that direct contact with this body fluid should be avoided..."

On January 11, 1985, the Center for Disease Control reported: "There is a risk of infecting others by ... exposure of others through oral-genital contact or intimate kissing." Dr. Richard Restak, a Washington neurologist, made this statement:

"At this point live AIDS virus has been isolated from blood, semen, serum, saliva, urine and now tears. If the virus exists in these fluids, the better part of wisdom dictates that we assume the possibility that it can also be transmitted by these routes. It seems reasonable, therefore, that AIDS victims should not donate blood or blood products, should not contribute to semen banks, should not donate tissues or organs to organ banks, should not work as dental or medical technicians, and should probably not be employed as food handlers."

Professor William Haseltine of the Harvard Medical School, in a presentation to a University audience, said that:

"anyone who tells you categorically that AIDS is not contracted by saliva is not telling you the truth. AIDS may in fact be transmissible by tears, saliva, bodily fluids, and mosquito bites."

Progress of the AIDS Epidemic
In the early 1990's the U.S. News and World Report stated: "If there is not a cure for AIDS within the next thirteen years, tens of millions will die." Even though there has been a lot of talk about AIDS awareness and prevention, the full danger of it has been covered-up by the Center for Disease Control, and the media which has increasingly shown its pro-homosexual bias.

AIDS is an epidemic that will not be stopped. The scientists that created this deadly virus have created an organism that multiplies 100 times faster than influenza. There are more than 180 different AIDS viruses and 300 strains, which makes blood testing meaningless. The virus is constantly mutating, which makes it impossible to develop a general vaccine that would be effective with everyone.

The Next Epidemic
Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus
World Net Daily reported on March 9, 2009 that:

The Canadian Press reports that Baxter International's European research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria, supplied materials contaminated with the deadly avian H5N1 influenza virus to a research company that then sent portions to labs in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany.

The labs thought they were receiving the less deadly, but more readily communicable, human H3N2 virus. When the Czech facility, however, injected a group of ferrets with the virus, the animals died – something that does not happen with H3N2 – prompting scientists to realize an error.

What the scientists were dealing with, in fact, was something far more dangerous.

Baxter's Austrian lab had sent a mix of H3N2 seasonal viruses and unlabeled, live H5N1 viruses(emphasis mine). H3N2 is highly communicable, but less harmful. H5N1 is less easily transmitted to humans, but often lethal. If both strains, scientists fear, were to incubate in a single subject, a hybrid virus could be birthed capable of both sweeping the globe and killing in its wake.

As for the feared mixing of the viruses, called reassortment, an official of the World Health Organization's European operation believes the potential disaster was contained.

The Press also reports that a number of biosecurity experts have expressed dissatisfaction with the explanation of simple error. As a biosafety level 3 facility (out of a maximum of four established safety levels, each requiring different safety precautions), the experts insist, the co-mingling of human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses should not be allowed to happen.

The H5N1 virus, Reuters reports, has infected over 400 people in 15 countries since 2003, killing 254 of them and leading to the culling of millions of birds around the world to contain it. [just based on these numbers this is a 63% kill rate!, Steve].

Baxter International makes flu vaccines – including a human H5N1 vaccine in process of being approved – at a facility in the Czech Republic.

From Socio-Economics History Blog:

Baxter is acting a whole lot like a biological terrorism organization these days, sending deadly viral samples around the world. If you mail an envelope full of anthrax to your Senator, you get arrested as a terrorist. So why is Baxter — which mailed samples of a far more deadly viral strain to labs around the world — getting away with saying, essentially, “Oops?”But there’s a bigger question in all this: How could this company have accidentally mixed LIVE avian flu viruses (both H5N1 and H3N2, the human form) in this vaccine material?

Was the viral contamination intentional?
The shocking answer is that this couldn’t have been an accident. Why? Because Baxter International adheres to something called BSL3(Biosafety Level 3) - a set of laboratory safety protocols that prevent the cross-contamination of materials. As explained on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosaf…):

"Laboratory personnel have specific training in handling pathogenic and potentially lethal agents, and are supervised by competent scientists who are experienced in working with these agents. This is considered a neutral or warm zone. All procedures involving the manipulation of infectious materials are conducted within biological safety cabinets or other physical containment devices, or by personnel wearing appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment. The laboratory has special engineering and design features."

Czech newspapers are questioning if the shocking discovery of vaccines contaminated with the deadly avian flu virus which were distributed to 18 countries by the American company Baxter were part of a conspiracy to provoke a pandemic.

The claim holds weight because, according to the very laboratory protocols that are routine for vaccine makers, mixing a live virus biological weapon with vaccine material by accident is virtually impossible.

Initially, Baxter attempted to stonewall questions by invoking “trade secrets” and refused to reveal how the vaccines were contaminated with H5N1. After increased pressure they then claimed that pure H5N1 batches were sent by accident. This was seemingly an attempt to quickly change the story and hide the fact that the accidental contamination of a vaccine with a deadly biological agent like avian flu is virtually impossible and the only way it could have happened was by wilful gross criminal negligence.

According to a compiled translation from Czech newspaper stories, the media over there is asking tough questions about whether the contamination was part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic."

Was this just a criminal negligence or it was an attempt to provoke pandemia using vaccination against flu to spread the disease - as happened with the anti-B hepatitis vaccination with vaccines containing the HIV virus in US? - and then cash for the vaccines against H5N1 which Baxter develops? How on Earth could a virus as H5N1 come to the ordinary flu vaccines? Don’t they follow even basic precautions in the american pharma companies?" states the translation.

The fact that Baxter mixed the deadly H5N1 virus with a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses is the smoking gun. The H5N1 virus on its own has killed hundreds of people, but it is less airborne and more restricted in the ease with which it can spread. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which as everyone knows are super-airborne and easily spread, the effect is a potent, super-airbone, super deadly biological weapon.

Spreading bird flu would create an instantaneous surge of demand for bird flu vaccines. The profits that vaccine companies such as Baxter International could reap out of such a panic are astronomical.

In addition, as we have previously reported, those that have a stake in the Tamiflu vaccine include top globalists and Bilderberg members like George Shultz, Lodewijk J.R. de Vink and former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Authorities in both Europe and the U.S. have openly detailed plans for martial law, quarantine and internment should a bird flu pandemic occur.

The other motivation, as we have exhaustively documented on this website for years, is the fact that elites throughout history have openly stated that they want to see a world population reduction of around 80 per cent. Shocking stories like this take the plausibility of that narrative out of the realms of conspiracy theory and into the dangerous reality of conspiracy fact.

This is not the first time that vaccine companies have been caught distributing vaccines contaminated with deadly viruses. In 2006 it was revealed that Bayer Corporation had discovered that their injection drug, which was used by hemophiliacs, was contaminated with the HIV virus. Internal documents prove that after they positively knew that the drug was contaminated, they took it off the U.S. market only to dump it on the European, Asian and Latin American markets, knowingly exposing thousands, most of them children, to the live HIV virus. Government officials in France went to prison for allowing the drug to be distributed. The documents show that the FDA colluded with Bayer to cover-up the scandal and allowed the deadly drug to be distributed globally. No Bayer executives ever faced arrest or prosecution in the United States(emphasis mine).

Jeff Rense interviewed Dr. Rima Laibow M.D., a graduate of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine documenting another incident of the pharmaceutical companies placing H5N1 in the Flu Mist vaccine.



How quickly could H5N1 [either a manmade retro-virus or a virus made by gene-splicing (recombinat DNA)] spread through the population? According to the CDC

Because these viruses do not commonly infect humans, there is little or no immune protection against them in the human population. If the H5N1 virus were able to infect people and spread easily from person to person, an "influenza pandemic" (worldwide outbreak of disease) could begin.

By combining deadly H5N1, with easily communicable H3N2 creating a new retro-virus, the H5N1 could easily spread from person to person creating a world-wide "influenza pandemic".

I believe that we have just witnessed the secomd attempt to create a new H5N1 pandemic by combining it with the easily communicable H3N2 human flu virus by Baxter International's European research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria.

For a discussion of smallpox and the SARS virus, a new bioweapon click here.

Are you prepared for an H5N1 pandemic?

We know that the government is. (Read the table of Contents on page 6 of this pdf.)

"A prudent man sees danger and takes refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it." Proverbs 22:3 NIV.

"And as he sat upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?" Matthew 24:3 KJV.

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers" [various]places. All these are the beginning of sorrows."(emphasis added.) Matthew 24:7,8 KJV.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Ephesians 6:12 KJV.

Steveourfutureworld.blogspot.com

BIRTH PANGS!
Understanding World Events and the Credit Crisis*
For many of us, reading history does not provide us with the flavor of life, the uncertainties of the moment and the fears of facing the truth of the situation. The events over the past six weeks and more specifically from August, 2007 have provided us with a myriad of events which leave even the most astute observer speechless. Over the past fourteen years, I have written extensively about a global currency, global tax, global stock exchange, global central bank, and world government. I have stated on many occasions that world government is not coming, it is here. In order to bring in world government, it will have to be through crisis—continuing, constant crises. The solution will be world government, total integration of all the countries of the world.

The credit crisis has evolved over the past 13 months from a problem regarding a small percentage of sub-prime mortgages to a full blown global credit crisis. In response, Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson issued the "Treasury Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory System." By reading the Blueprint, it is very clear that the former international banker, turned treasury secretary, is basically waging all out war on American financial sovereignty, demanding that all of our remaining financial assets be federalized and put under the control of the Federal Reserve.

In light of the credit crisis and all the money the Federal Reserve is making available, it should be understood that the private corporation of the Federal Reserve prints money on demand and has grown immensely in power over its 95 years of existence. Whenever America needs money, it simply prints it up out of paper, calls the newly created note "The Federal Reserve Note" and credits the account of the United States of America for the liability of the loan. The reason why Americans cannot forgive themselves the interest on the debt is because it is owed to the Federal Reserve and not ourselves. They have a racket going that is better than all of the mafia’s of the world combined. They have brought the most powerful country in the world to its knees by usurping the authority of congress, which has bestowed a blank check to the Federal Reserve giving it all powers. However, we won’t fall completely on our faces until the new international regulation demanded by the Blueprint is put in place.

The rocking and rolling has only begun. We are in the final stages of a move into world government. Congress has already shown they are emotionally weak and that they have no idea of what they are doing or not doing. They have not defended the Constitution they swore to upon hold, as they are playing into the hands of the Federal Reserve and the other major central banks of the world, which are controlled by a small group of very powerful people. In order to finalize the Blueprint, which I have heard will come before a new Congress in January, what will it take to traumatize the new legislators? Will the powers that be decide on a Banking Holiday in the spirit of 1933? Will they cause a total bank collapse by demanding sound banks to down grade their solid loans, as has recently occurred when the Comptroller of the Currency did a bank audit? Or will they simply change our currency to adjust our debt load?

In the book of Esther, we read about the decision a young Jewess had to make in response to the pending annihilation of her people. At the urging of her uncle, she broke all royal protocol to make a plea to her husband, the country’s ruler. Her uncle said, "Who knows if you have come into the kingdom for such a time as this?" The days ahead will try our very souls.

When you see the value of your savings drop by 50% and the equity in your home dwindle to the point of foreclosure, what will you do? Who will you turn to? The day the banks close, whether for a day or week, is the day Americans will really wake up to the cold hard facts that the world has changed and individual nation-states are no longer.

Epilogue
"I am staggered by what I hear, I am bewildered by what I see." Isaiah 21:3.

"Look, here comes a man...And he gives back the answer: 'Babylon has fallen, has fallen! All the images of its gods lie shattered on the ground!'" Isaiah 21:9.
Steve
End Notes
*Joan Veon, October 6, 2008 NewsWithViews.com

ourfutureworld.blogspot.com

ORDO AB CHAO
ORDER OUT OF CHAOS
Order Will Come Out Of The Current Derivative Crisis.
Would you like to know what it will be?
The world's elite(Illuminati) have planned the solution for many years. In fact they created the current crisis to implement their proposed solution.(Hegelian Dialectic)
"National currencies are a phenomenon of the twentieth century; supranational currencies are the solution for the future."(1)

"It is clear in what direction we need to move. We need to construct, out of the assets currently used by the monetary authorities, a new world currency."(2)

"The question now is not whether the world will adopt a Single Global Currency but when? and How smooth, inexpensive, and planful OR rough, costly and chaotic will the journey be?"(3)[italics and capitals in original]

"We must set new rules for a 21st century global economic system....For the first time in history we have the opportunity to come together around a global covenant, to re frame the international architecture and build the truly global society."(4) This quote brings to mind Revelation 17:13 "These have one mind and shall give their power and strength unto the beast."

Folks we are in the throes of that journey today: the creation of a truly global society and creation in stages of a single global currency.

Crisis Equals Opportunity
The manipulation of money is, arguably, the most potent method used outside of war to rapidly rearrange society. Am I suggesting that our current economic crisis will be used as leverage to re-structure our Western world? The odds are in favor of it. Consider what the father of modern economics, John Maynard Keynes, had to say in 1919.

"There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debouch the currency." - John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, (1919), p.236.

This is rather startling, considering that we've been using Keynes' theories of political economy as our main driver since the end of World War II. Roughly speaking, Keynesian economics is the idea that governments can stimulate the economy through interest rate management (the heart of credit and debt), taxation programs, and other state-instituted incentive programs. Although the above quote was aimed primarily at inflationary actions, the same conclusion could be made regarding any form of monetary leveraging.

Three other quotes come to mind:

"The great struggle of history has been for the control over money. It is almost tautological to affirm that to control the production and distribution of money is to control the wealth, resources, and people of the world." - Jack Weatherford, The History of Money (Crown Publishers, 1997), p.246.

"The control of money and credit strikes at the very heart of national sovereignty." - A.W. Clausen [then president of Bank of America], in a 1979 interview with the Freeman Digest, "International Banking," p.21.

"..new comprehensive politico-economic systems across peoples almost always arise out of conquest or common crisis..." - A.W. Clausen, Freeman Digest, "International Banking," p. 23.

The links between economic crisis and societal change cannot be ignored. During the mid-1970s a "new international economic order"(5) was proposed in light of growing energy costs, world currency imbalances, and other shake-ups in the global system. The objective of this movement- which emanated from Algeria found support through the Group of Non-Aligned Countries(6) - was to change the capitalist/Western-oriented world financial structure into a more socialist styled model.

The Club of Rome, an elite Group of eminent leaders, also supported this effort. In 1976 it fleshed out what this "new international economic order" would look like. According to the Club, the world's social, political, cultural, and economic composition needed to be re-aligned under a sweeping system of international management.(emphasis mine) This included the promotion of regional monetary integration, the creation of a World Treasury agency, and international taxation powers - all with the aim of progressing "towards a world-wide monetary system."(7)(emphasis mine).

How would citizens come to accept such radical changes? The Club of Rome understood the historical mechanism needed: Crisis.(8)

Although the "new international economic order" fell apart due to infighting between agenda-supporting countries (among other factors), the principle of "economic crisis" and "change" never went away.

Flash forward one year past the famous 1987 stock market crash.

A Rising Phoenix for a New DEY


On January 9, 1988, The Economist published a cover story about a proposed international currency called the Phoenix. Like the mythical firebird that arises out of the ashes of destruction, this international currency would likewise emerge from the chaos of crisis. As the article noted, it would take "several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stock market crashes and probably a slump or two" before politicians would accept the Phoenix and secede monetary power to a higher authority. The Economist even suggested a start-up date: 2018.(9) Looking to curb government-led monetary mismanagement, a problem that seems to plague every nation-state, the article suggested a radical re-arrangement: Country-level decision making would have to disappear under a world central bank and its new global currency.

There would be no such thing, for instance as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF(International Monetary Fund). The world inflation rate - and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate - would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking the sovereignty away in any case.(10)

More recently, Robert Mundell - the "father of the euro" - has been traveling around the world lecturing on the hoped-for creation of a new national currency called the DEY, a combination of the US dollar, euro, and yen. Crisis, Mundell realized, will open this door. He stated, "International monetary reform usually becomes possible only in response to a felt need and the threat of global crisis."(11) This Nobel Prize winner also pointed his finger to the possible trigger event, saying that the "global crisis would have to involve the dollar," and that a world currency should be viewed as "a contingency" to a global dollar disaster.(12)

And Ben Steil, the Director of International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR), suggested a re-making of the world's financial system around three key currencies - the US dollar, euro, and a new Asian monetary unit. Steil implied that the hinge-point for this development would be a major shake-up involving the US dollar.(13)

Today, during every news hour, we hear more talk of the global financial emergency, an ongoing event that isn't going away. Therefore, it shouldn't be a surprise to learn that some world leaders are actively promoting a new global order as a response to the current crisis. For example, England's Prime Minister, Mr. Gordon Brown, has been hotly pushing the idea of an international financial restructuring, and more. In fact, he's been preaching this global gospel for some time. Consider this statement made while in Boston on April 18, 2008.

We must set new rules for a 21st century global economic system....My vision is a new World Bank and IMF, a reformed UN and strong regional organizations from the European Union to [the] African Union...For the first time in history we have the opportunity to come together around a global covenant, to re frame the international architecture and build the truly global society."(14)

Indeed, crisis does equal opportunity.

The conclusion of the matter
"For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. Revelation 17:17.

For God has put it in their hearts to cooperate, to "act in harmony", in order to set the stage for the appearance of Antichrist on the world scene" Revelation 17:17 Parallel Bible KJV, Amplified Bible Commentary.

*This article with the exception of the "Conclusion of the Matter" and the first four footnoted quotes is an excerpt from "The Joseph Principle and Crisis Economics" by Carl Teichrib as reprinted in Gary Kah's "Hope For The World Update" Winter 2009. Carl Teichrib is editor of Forcing Change, a monthly intelligence styled publication on world political, economic, and religious change.

Gary Kah is author of two land-mark books Enroute to Global Occupation and The New World Religion. Gary keeps interested readers informed of the latest international economic, political and religious developments through his research news journal Hope for the World Update. Click here to subscribe or to review some recent articles.

End Notes

1. Ricardo Hausman [Chief Economist, Inter-American Development Bank], "Why the Interest in Reform? Discussion," Rethinking the International Monetary System (Federal Reserve Reserve Bank of Boston, 1999). p.96.
2. Robert Mundell ["father of the euro"], "Plan for a World Currency," a briefing prepared for the US Joint Economic Committee, 1968.
3. Morrison Bonpasse [President the Single Global Currency Association], The Single Global Currency: Common Cents for the World (Single Global Currency Association, 2006), p.229.
4. Gordon Brown [Prime Minister of Great Britain], Developments, Issue 42, p.4.
5. Philip C Born, The Coming Century of Commonism: The Beauty and the Beast of Global Governance (Policy Books, 1992, pp. 27-53.
6. See, Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (E.P. Dutton, 1976),p. 4. The oil crisis and OPEC's role in third-world advocacy played a monumental part in setting the stage for this movement. For more on this development, see Jean-Jaques Servan-Schreiber, The World Challenge (Simon and Schuster, 1980)
7. Ibid., pp.126-134.
8. Ibid., p. 110.
9. Cover story , "Get Ready for the Phoenix," The Economist, January 9, 1988.
10. Ibid.
11. Robert Mundell, "A Decade Later: Asia New Responsibilities in the International Monetary System," presentation given in Seoul, South Korea, May, 2-3, 2007.
12. Ibid.
13. Ben Steil, "The End of National Currency," Foreign Affairs, May/June 2007.
14. PM Gordon Brown, as reprinted in Developments, the magazine of Britain's Department of International Development, Issue 42, p. 4.

Steve
ourfutureworld.blogspot.com