FUTURE WORLD

TIME ALWAYS TELLS THE TALE

Last week we heard from Henry Kissinger about the ""War of Civilizations". Kissinger was national security adviser for former president Richard Nixon, and secretary of state for Nixon and his successor Gerald Ford. His remarks, some of which I have quoted below, reveal an astonishing amount of information about the plan for a world government.

In an opinion column in the Washington Post, the renowned foreign policy expert said the potential for a "global catastrophe" dwarfed lingering transatlantic mistrust left over from the Iraq war.

'Both sides of the Atlantic should put their best minds together on how to deal with the common danger of a wider war merging into a war of civilizations against the background of a nuclear-armed Middle East."

He concluded by noting that observers wondered whether, after the Cold War, trans-Atlantic ties could survive the loss of a common enemy.

Mr. Kissinger just revealed to us one of the purposes of the cold war: to unite Europe and the United States into a closer trans-Atlantic relationship to fight the Russian Communist bogeyman. Since this common enemy supposedly disappeared with the "downfall" of the Berlin wall in 1989 it is time for a new bogeyman to aide in the regionalization of the world by developing closer trans-Atlantic ties to fight the Moslem Jihadist.

"We now know that we face the imperative of building a new world order or potential global catastrophe. It cannot be done alone by either side of the Atlantic. Is that realization sufficient to regenerate a common purpose?" ---------Henry Kissinger

CONCLUSION

Wicked men in high places have been contemplating and planning a "war of civilizations" for years. In a letter to the Italian revolutionary leader Giuseppe Mazzini dated 15 August 1871 Albert Pike, the leader of Illuminati's activities in the United States and the head of Scottish Rite Freemasonry at the time, described a final distant war which he felt would be necessary to usher in the New World Order. According to Pike, this conflict between two future superpowers would be sparked by first igniting a crisis between Islam and Judaism. He went on to write:

We shall unleash the nilhilists and the atheists and we shall provoke a great social cataclysm which, in all its horror, will show clearly to all nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of most bloody turmoil. Then, everywhere, the people, forced to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization; and the multitudes, disillusioned with Christianity whose deistic spirits will be from that moment on without direction or leadership , anxious for an ideal but without knowledge where to send its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out into public view; a manifestation which will result from a general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.(1)

EPILOGUE

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." Henry Kissinger , New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973.

"The enormous gap between what US leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominate political mythology."
Michael Parenti


Steve

This article may be reproduced WITHOUT CHANGE and in its entirety for non-commercial and non-political purposes. ourfutureworld.blogspot.com

END NOTES

1. Myron Fagan, The Illuminati-CFR, Emmissary Publications, TP-107, 1968. This letter between Pike and Mazzini is now catalogued in the British Museum in London (according to Salem Kirban, Satan's Angels Exposed, 164) quoted from Gary Kah, En Route To Global Occupation, Huntington House Publishers, Lafayette, Louisiana, 1992, p.144-145.

THE REAL STORY OF THE WAR ON TERROR

An analysis of data from Justice Department's Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys found:

_In the eight months ending last May, Justice attorneys declined to prosecute more than 9 out of every 10 terrorism cases sent to them by the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies. Nearly 4 in 10 of the rejected cases were scrapped because prosecutors found weak or insufficient evidence, no evidence of criminal intent or no evidence of federal crime.

_Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, only 14 people have been sentenced to 20 years or more in prison in terrorism cases. Of the 1,329 convicted defendants, only 625 received any prison sentence. More than half got no prison time or no more than they had already served awaiting their verdict.

According to a study released Sunday by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), a data research group at Syracuse University:

TRAC totaled the cases that prosecutors labeled as terrorism or antiterrorism no matter what charge was brought. It found only 14 prosecutions in fiscal 2000. That rose to 57 in fiscal 2001, which ended three weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks. The figure then soared to 355 in fiscal 2002. But by fiscal 2005 it dropped to 46. And in the first eight months of fiscal 2006, through last May, there were only 19 such prosecutions.

Meredith Fuchs, general counsel at the National Security Archive at George Washington University, stated:

The surge right after 9/11 make sense, but the drop-off so quickly means either a lot of that post-9/11 activity was not necessary or that they haven't identified key people or that key people in custody aren't being prosecuted.

While the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies make a big splash in the media about arresting all those suspected terrorists to frighten and subdue U.S. citizens into complying with the new anti-terrorism measures, the U.S. government only pays lip service to actually prosecuting the real terrorists similar to the government's poor prosecution record of illegal immigrants.

James Dempsey, policy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology stated, "We can't blame the FBI for pursuing those leads, but we can blame them and the Justice Department for arresting people and making a big media splash when things don't pan out."


EPILOGUE

It would seem that the FBI and Homeland Security now operate under a different philosophy from what our founding fathers intended. It is one of the unique characteristics that makes The United States of America a free country. It is the philosophy that a U.S citizen is innocent of a crime until proven guilty. The FBI and Homeland Security have changed that philosophy to guilty until proven innocent which is the mark of a Fascist police state.

What does this justice department data prove? That many of these "terrorist" arrests in fact have no basis since "...prosecutors found weak or insufficient evidence, no evidence of criminal intent or no evidence of federal crime" in 4 out of 10 cases with 9 out of 10 cases not being prosecuted!



Steve

This article may be reproduced WITHOUT CHANGE and in its entirety for non-commercial and non-political purposes. ourfutureworld.blogspot.com